Scripts are believed to have evolved from pictographs. Some scripts, like the Chinese script, for instance, are still pictorial. Over time obtaining information via these scripts subtly creates viewing habits in the human mind. These scripts, which are visual cues for sounds, dicscipline and, in some cases, even prejudice our conduct. The habit these scripts impose on us, in turn, subtly inform and influence our perspectives, relationships, and behavior.
As there was no one like Panini to order and organize the alphabet of the Abrahamic languages - which was adopted by the Roman, mainly their monks in the Roman Catholic Church. The Church lots of power over the affairs of people who lived beyond the borders of present day Italy and, as a result, their script came to be used for all the languages in Eurpoe.
The Indic languages - spoken in most of Asia except
the Oriental countries like China, Japan, Korea, Mongolia - are generally believed to be more ancient
the Abrahamic and European languages. They did experiemnted a lot in creating scripts and you can see that a large country like ours, which in many ways, comparable to the whole of Europe, has many scripts - Telugu, Gujarati, Bengali and so on. At a fortunate point in time we had Panini, who organized the alphabet and Grammar of the parent language, Sanskrit, so well that, although our scripts are different, all of us use the same alphabet and grammar.
One of the things he did was create a vowel system that made all these Indic scripts phonetic. In a stroke of genius,
when these vowels were attached to consonents, a set of marks, or maatraas, around them told you how to pronounce it. As an example, in having to write 'ko' in the Roman script you need to write the 'k' and, next to it, the vowel ''o'. But if you were to to do this in the Devnaagari script you simply add the maatraa of the vowel 'O'.
When you read words in the non-phonetic Roman
script, part of your mind is busy acessing your 'pronouncing archive' so that when you have
deciphered the spelling by looking at group of the vowels and consonents in front of you and figure out how to pronounce it. In this situation of having to use up some resources to access the memory of the sound of the word you are forced to minimize your attention on what is in front of you. If you stop to notice you will find that in reading English words in Roman script you pay more attention to the first few letters of the word and surmise the rest from context. If the first few letters are' journ' you will surmise from context that the others are either 'ey' or 'al.' You will not really look at them. This is true of wording ending in 'tion' or 'ing' and you seldom 'see' them but surmise from context. I call this habit, 'the skipping mind' because, our attention is, like a flat stone thrown horizontally over a pond, will skip over its surface - i.e. make only brief contacts with it - a few times before it sinks.
You can now see that by limiting yourself to the habit using the Roman script you invite a perceptible loss of acuity and sensitivity in perception and unsustained attention during a relationship event.
In the case of the Devnaagari script, you do not have
to go to your memory bank to find out how a particular group of letters has to be pronounced because the script is phonetic. So this frees up your mind to 'see' what is in front of you. Furthermore, as the maatraas surround the consonent, you have to first look at it, and then around it, for them. In this situation the mind is developing the habit of focusing on the central core and then on its periphery. Instead of the 'skipping mind' you have a mind that is always in balanced contact with what is in front of you.
One reason, why people from India are perceived to be 'smart' and 'brainy' is the way they relate to their scripts and the habits they acquire in doing so.
While we are certainly One-up in our alphabet, grammar and our script, we have to understand that, as bad money chases the good money out of the market, the perceived dominance of English, the Abrahamic alphabet and the Roman script today, is something need not be slaves to. Indians are lucky to have what they have, thanks to their forbears. But they will be pitiable if they will let it go for a
short-term advantage. If I were a dictator, I would say, "Learn and use English, its A,B,C,D, and its
nonphonetic script which burdens you with having to memorize the spellings of thousands of words, by all means, if you have to get ahead, BUT ONLY if you do not give up what is not only yours, but, in comparison, far superior.
1 comment:
very interesting insight :)
which is why i prefer audio :)
would love to hear you jax:
http://www.2020worldpeace.org/audiophiles/audiophiles.html
have you related maths to language?
and i would prefer an audio response
if you have the technology at your disposal
to avoid the problems you have written about here :)
thanks!
good post!
Post a Comment