Dec 24, 2006

Nistha’s Vision Statement

India’s Triangle of the 21st Century: States in the western parts of India have a faster-than-China growth rate whereas sub-Saharan conditions exist in eastern India1. It is here that a cyber organization promoting new initiatives in sustainable techniques for human advancement – Nişthä2 - has identified India’s Triangle of the 21st Century. It encompasses, in eastern India, the resources-rich-&-therefore-mercilessly-exploited “November 2000 States” of Chhatisgarh, Jharkhand and (the imminent) Kôsal Pradésh.

Nişthä believes that the Information-Outformation-Useformation – the IOU-Triquilibrium - is not yet globally concepted or locally implemented. The World-Bank-admitted Global Disparity Ratio, revised by the Brookings Institution at an unsustainable 135:l, evidences this. NIŞTHÄ shall catalyze triquilibrium-customizations within the afore-identified Triangle and beyond.

Nişthä’s Vision: Through organizational Syntegrations3 NIŞTHÄ shall initially become a multilingual, multi-media, multi-tasking network for gathering, assessing, processing, and adapting IOU-formation. It will then harvest and aim its leveraging feedback, to restore the epigenetic landscape of this region to a sustainable, omni-diverse, exemplary plenitude for all.

Nişthä’s Objective: Recalling that the word ‘industry’ has ‘Indus’ in it, NIŞTHÄ’s pioneering organizational systems will reclaim and expand the meaning of the word to make it inclusive of civilization itself. Applied engineering research and support (AERS) should lead to local industrial development and manufacture (IDM) of a plethora of wealth-&-employment generating eco-friendly, quality-of-life-enhancing products. Samples relevant to this Presentation are listed here below as NIŞTHÄ’s LEAD ideas:

Local Data-processing and communicational systems (LD-PCs)

PV computers, Multilinguaformation Radiophony Networks, Information Banks (with I-loans,

I-passbooks, and I-deposit-schemes) Links, monitoring, exchanges and NGO/GO coordination.

Efficient eco-Machines (e-Machines)

Pedal and bullock-powered machines including improved pedicabs and power-generators. Water-conserving irrigation systems. Portable solar crucible-furnaces for relevant metallurgy. School-chemistry microscience kits. Simputers. Titanium-oxide photovoltaic sheet manufacture, etc.

Alliance of Urban & Rural Communities

FM & DAB Radiocracies. Distance Learning & Continuing Education. Sustained Community revitalization & close-loop rural/urban industrial/utilities Health & Hygiene coordination.

Drought-fighting Applications Technologies (DAT)

Deployment of portable, laptop-&-software-connected ‘Groundflo’ water-locaters. Muscle-powered Cranfield bore-well machines. Organic Fertilizers & Health Foods, Livestock, Horticulture. Floriculture, Fisheries, Poultry, Value-added Perishables: Jellies-Jams-Juices.

These cyber-age LEAD ideas are, in fact, a sustainable Gandhian meld of the grass roots with

the global. We at Nisthä are, therefore, privileged to invite you to be our tana-mana-dhana4

co-participators in their syntegrated implementation in India’s Triangle of the 21st Century.

Globalization is meaningless to billions unless it prioritizes the revitalization of rural communities.

Oct 27, 2006

‘Sûndar,’ the Sanskrit word for beauty

Satyam-Shivam-Sûndaram

Few who drool over today’s ‘Perfect 10s’ pause to look for, or even expect, the other two components of beauty in that person, – truthfulness and goodness.
And few even pause to deconstruct the Sanskrit word for beauty ‘Sûndar’ and really understand that it can only mean ‘Sû + andar’ or, that which is ‘good inside.’

Share this, please, with the young who have the potential of being ‘Sûndar’ without being ‘fair and lovely’. After all, handsome is as handsome does, right!

Remember to look at the words, to hear and break their sounds up. You will often surprise yourself by making connections with Sanskrit that the lexicographers missed.

Sep 14, 2006

Response: Architecture for Emergent India

9:11 AM 9/14/2006

The following - an edited version of an attachment sent as a response to an article a friend had sent for publication in the August 15 issue of the New Delhi Outlook magazine - has been updated especially for Shri Sunandan Prasad, President-elect, RIBA, after I heard his thoughts aired this morning, in a BBC-Hindi interview.

This piece on “Architecture for Emergent India” has the word deliberately spelt with an ‘h’ tucked in it to emphasize my opinion that unless it is informed by technology appropriate for India, one might as well classify the discipline in the hocus-pocus category with Astrology, Palmistry, Creationism etc. as companions. The first two paragraphs deal with educational migration as it impacts upon ekistics and the form and ambiance of urban architechture. It is assumed that the reader is aware that all cities began as logistical nodes for the transcation and movement of goods; that those that didn’t were exceptions; and finally, that all the paraphernalia of state management, including utilities and services (education, enteratainment etc.) were add-ons

08/09/2006

Education, especially if it aims to be jobs- and skills-oriented, ‘adds value’ to the “Human Resources Product” In India, this value-added ‘product’ (aka he/she) then moves “up” the so-called “value chain” - and begins migrating away from villages to towns, and then on to cities and metros - where, in search of the so-imagined “good life”, it isn’t happy until it has jetted out to melanin defficient areas (aka the West, aka Europe, Australia and the Americas). In the process, all that value is really added to, is to its ego; and all that has really enhanced is this ‘value-added’ product’s consuming capacity on a per capita basis - these two are doubtful measures for what a “good life” is. (In the next few days I shall send you my non-Western-based understanding of what education is all about, and for this I shall have to choose the Hindi language.)

The metrofied, educational-value added product, even as it becomes anti-social, also laterally broadens the State’s tax-base. It enhances the State’s power, particularly its policing, regulating and controlling powers. As power increases, so does the nuisance value of - and opportunity for - corrupt, unresponsive, unaccountable, extravagent, inefficient, wasteful and vested behavior of its minions and ministers, whose essential job is to multiply problems by imagining and implementing more man-&-machine-power needing anti-solutions that complicate the problems. This outward spiral of complicated problems geographically expands into a megalopolis, which is a gargantuan that excels in generating ever-larger volumes waste - as witness the broad-banded, open-air dump-ring that encircles all Indian cities, parallell to their ‘ring roads’ and ‘by-passes’ - and criminal behavior.

~ The authors of the book, Natural Capitalism observe, “Too often, cities find that the cause of their problems is prior solutions that have either missed their mark or boomeranged, like the bigger road that invites more traffic, the river channelization that worsens floods, the homeless shelter that spreads tuberculosis, and the prison that trains criminals in more sophisticated techniques.”

~ Which brings me to address your essay on architechture appropriate for an emergent India in this century for the August 15 Outlook magazine.

Against the Kenneth Clark quote with which you concluded it - it speaks only of the historically retentive capabilites of architechture - I have this one from Hugh Kenner* that illuminates its more pervasive influence, and even ends with a question that hasn’t yet been satisfactorily addressed by anyone I know of, although Kahlil Gibran and Kabir have reminded me of the enduring nature of the question. In the preface to his book, “A Guided Tour Of R. Buckminster Fuller”, Kenner says, “We get our everyday language, hence our criteria, from what we understand of the visible environment, especially from what we understand to be the successful human gestures, the structures that last…. Buildings seem Man’s most successful creations and the idiom of architectural success seeps into our minds… But what if we have been misreading architechture…?” While I have changed the sentence-order here, a fuller version from which this is extracted is at* below.

~ While on Bucky Fuller - and as your article speaks of appropriate airports for India - I also recall that he had been invited to advise the Indian Government’s International Airports Authority. The denoument bore out our mutual friend the late Member of Parliament Piloo Mody’s about corruption. The impatient minister came to meet Fuller and asked to make sure that the cement contract went to his son.

~ And speaking of airport design, I was living in Los Angeles at the time “Ayodhyaa” happened and, for a few weeks I toyed with the idea of suggesting how, with structural/architecthtural knowhow then existing, it was possible to position a Raama Temple at exactly the same spot as desired, regardless of what Baabur may have built there. I was taking inspiration from the landmark Airport Restaurant, built several years earlier, that perches on the flat landscape, spiderlike, on four arching legs. It had its 360º surround-view hub suspended several meters above air.

~ Not many architects know that it is possible to economically elevate whole communities up in the air, needing the ground only for the kind of anchors that ships use. What price an earthquake? Or, a Tsunami? Most Indian architects I have met are chicken-hearted, not daring even to suggest anything “outlandish” that might ’scare away’ a prosprective client. Whether it is rammed earth homes - that cost a fourth of of brick and mortar stuff - or, the energy efficient building in hot Harare that cuts down on electricity bills for airconditiong by close to 90%, you won’t find them in urban India. When I built a mosque with an aluminium dome that needed no frame and fastners and was up in just 5 hours, guys in New Delhi wouldn’t even believe their eyes when they saw detailed pictures. Come to think of it, I don’t know of any such structure even in the United States - one that interlocking panels I had designed that needed neither frame nor fasteners.

~ A rather extreme but helpful view on architechture says it is still little improved since the stone age; that buildings are fancy nozzles on sewer mains and they have been likened to a patient in the I.C. Units, needing conduits and wires to hook up to various utilities. The highrise ones have been called “vertical slums” with the laundry drying on their umpteen balconies. And those edifices that remind us of the past have been described as “Tombs made by the dead, for the living”

~ Jagat Singh Chawla, a deceased friend who had a refugee-background, lived most of his life here running a furniture shop. Once he spoke of how, back in those days in undivided rural Punjab, the smart farmer would deliberately build just a small two-room house on his large plot of land. As the kids grew and got married - and the couple grew advanced in age - they were cleverly and slowly crouded out. Needing a separate roof, the obvious place would be to build another two-roomed house on the plot. This ensured )a) that the children would have to work hard for it and not become useless wastrels had their fathers provided for them by building a large home with several rooms and (b) they would still be near their parents in their old age. Now, that is the native intelligence that the exhibitionistic novou riche in India seem to have lost.

~ Which reminds me that Jhagadu Shah, circa second century A D, who was probably the richest man on earth at that time, lived in a simple unostentatious hut with just his wife - and no retinues serving them. Mr. Shah of Kathiavaad, Gujarat, bankrolled, among other things, the construction of the Naalanda and Vikramshilaa universities, in far away Bihar. ——————-

* ~ As professor of English literature at McGill, Kenner had felt the need to write a series of ‘Guided Tours’ aimed mainly for his students. One of them was “A Guided Tour of Buckminster Fuller”; To make up for the stupidity of throwing him out a couple of times, your ‘gurukul’, i.e. Harvarrd University, had, at that point in time, made him a visiting Charles Eliot Norton Professor of Poetry - Poetry, of all things!

The complete quotation from Hugh Kenner’s “A Guided Toir of R. Buckminster Fuller” and a couple of extra comments are as follows: “…We talk be unspecified analogy, especially by intuitive analogies, with architechture. Buildings seem Man’s most successful creations and the idiom of architectural success seeps into our minds. A poem may be a little ‘gem’ but a novel or an epic is like a building. It has ‘structure’ sometimes even ‘foundations’. The writer ‘designs’ a ‘framework’ and also works with ‘surfaces’, which are less important. It is filled with ‘perspectives’ emanating from ‘points of view’. If it really claims attention then it is ‘weighty’…Could a policy be stated in Washington without the word ‘basis’? …School supervisors ask for ‘lesson plans’… (These architectural analogies) locate the conditioned reflexes by which we value…not just literature but virtually all human behavior and, in fact, Reality…We get our everyday language, hence our criteria, from what we understand of the visible environment, especially from what we understand to be the successful human gestures, the structures that last. But what if we have been misreading architechture, misreading the human effort?….” So completely integrated is architechture to our everyday language that even its grammar speaks of words as ‘building blocks’. Outline, plot, preface, scenario, etc. are all visual, architectural words. Kenner seems to be saying that the roots of our perceptions and thoughts, reflexes even, lie outside of us in the architechture, artifacts, and the audio- visual environment the species creates and spins around itself. If he is right those roots may be extending all the way back to a guy called Euclid. They do. The great architect-philosopher, R. Buckminster Fuller, described in a 1964 TIME magazine cover-story as the Leornado da Vinci of the 20th century, agrees. “…Major reflex conditioning of Society,” he points out, “Springs from the universal elementary education with Greek Geometry…”

————————-

11:42 AM 9/14/2006

Aug 27, 2006

Etymology Practice

Get interested in words. Find out how they were/are minted and used. Otherwise, your mind can take a beating on the anvil of the skills-hawking wordsmiths. Jargon and bafflegab can devour you.

Here are a dozen ‘resonances’ you can limber up your listening mind with; on the left are English words and on the right are their Sanskrit connections, and below each set, my comments:

1. Person = Prasanna
You can’t be called a person unless you are happy.

2. Service = Sarvasva = Sarva+Sva
You really serve when you keep others before yourself.

3. Mentor = Mantra

4. Government = Gûrû+mantra
This suggests an advisory, rather than a regulatory function of the government. The lexicographers say that the word has Greek roots. That, to me is B.S.

5. Statement = Stûti + mantra
Kind of obvious!

6. Management = Manûj + mantra
Ditto! Here it is the art of persuasion by appealing to their minds.

7. Etymology = Atha + Moolajah
Literally, the Sanskrit words mean, “Here lie the roots”; which is what, the OCD the English word means:
“The historically verifiable sources of the formation of a word and the development of its meaning”.

8. Decoration = Dekhô ré shän
Obvious, no? I owe a friend for this one.

9. Vast Pyramid = Västûparamidam
This one is neat. I used it for the title of a paper that was published in a learned journal that had devoted an issue to pyramids.

10. Market Capitalism = Mär + kät Kapat + Tilism
Ha! that’s the sum and substance of that awful progenitor of MTV, Hollywood, Atom Bomb, Al Quaida and Saddam Hussein and the other evils of yesterday. (Remember Osama and Saddam were all fed and nurtured by the vanguard votary of MC?) I used that as a title of a piece for a Hindi periodical that focuses on finance and economics.

11. Wit = Vita
As a noun, the Sanskrit word isn’t really a compliment. The more curious can research it.

12. Smart = Smärta
Now that one certainly means more than what you think. The Sanskrit word resonates with the one for memory. So unless you have a good memory you are not Smärta, no matter how sharply you dress or what attitude-chip you carry on your shoulder.



Words are the currency of the global mind’s commerce. Remember ‘In the beginning was the Word. And the Word was with…?

May 2, 2006

A hybrid, community-inclusive, self-organizing format

Western India betters China. Under mäyee-bäp (patronizing, initiative-extinguishing, “we-know-better” attitude) visham-vikäs (developmental disparities), eastern India is sub-Sahäran.


My 3G (grassroots, global, godly) remedy: with non-interfering IDM-support, my NGO friends and I will, to a three-fifths-villages-fractal, aim to offer:


1. A hybrid, community-inclusive, self-organizing format I call the Sväsynt 5. Through it they can:

(a) Uproot the hopeless dependency infected into them, and

(b) Self-organize as initiative-taking, decision-skilled, and development-determining units that can order, receive and pay for improved infrastructure-needs/information-

services they may need from elsewhere.


2. With chosen vendors, Sväsynt rural communities will use the self-managed access of the vision-specified, BhaYûSh IT-System to offer markets for improved info-services relevant to their eco-agricultural, educo-health, produce-outlet and transportation needs that they will then self-fulfill.


We will demonstrate that ‘Digital Divide is a dumb phrase’, and that ‘Small is profitable’.

-- Submitted to the WB-IDM Innovation-Competition 2004 Improve Rural Services - Access and Quality. See also my Nişthä Vision Statement

Apr 24, 2006

A Primer of Recent Human History

Under the overlay of oligarchies, plutocracies, monarchies (OPM) and anarchies which obsess historians, there was, at the level of the vast and populated countryside of the world’s old cultures, Consensual Governance with many localized diversities and variations. There was little paper-shuffling. No computer-assisted bureaucracies wielded remote but powerful Command-&-Control Centers (CCCs). Consensual Governance was human scale. It focused on equilibriums, not equalities.

The change first occurred in the geographical harshness of tribally attenuated, pagan Europe. To neutralize the marauding local aggressions, the tyrannical alliance of the fiefs and the Church scaled up Governance so that the affairs of the populace began to be affected by Power seized and vested in remote CCCs. It took a while for the consequent ferment and upheaval to culminate in beheadings, revolution and the general acceptance of Majority Governance, a.k.a., ‘Lesser Evil’.

After this, however, colonial greed plus industrial enterprise, plus the zeal to protect from those CCCs, the intellectualized notions of ‘Rights & Freedoms’ over-individualized the people. This tempted community-members away from the responsibilities and self-disciplines inherent under local Consensual Governance. Bureaucracies, politics and (for profit) enterprise gave larger-than-human-scale ‘Lesser Evils’ in Europe a spin, which, in imitation of previous bully-oppressors, in effect, progressively internationalized regional plunder-&-protection rackets. Families, communities and academia - instead of producing skilled, socially disciplined citizens - began churning out rainbow-chasing taxpayers, hedonist jobbers, entitlement jockeys and over-consuming escape artists.

Meanwhile, nominal ‘governors’ of these regional rackets, whether ‘representative’ or otherwise, had only the hero/martyr OPM paradigm-guidelines to establish - in opposition to the corpus of conventions, traditions and folk wisdom - man-made Rule of Law at these large, inhuman scales. The audacious – and now scientifically proven as fallacious – presumptions were:

(a) Nature was ‘wild’ and needed to conquered and tamed.
(b) Natural man was a ‘savage’ who must be schooled and civilized.
(c) God and his/her/its creation was inherently chaotic and lawless; it needed to be ordered and organized.

Under this hallucinatory paranoia of ‘Progress & Development’, predation and destruction were prosecuted with arrogant expedition: Strip mines wounded the land; its forests cleared into oblivion. Dams squeeze-damned rivers. Mountains were blown apart; the oceans were emptied of life and converted into grounds for dumping waste. Even the air was injected with toxic pollutants. All that had been held in reverence by the heritage of humankind was trashed and trivialized. More fat to the fire, these regional Euro-USian micro-macro management examples became desirable ‘management’ models for the new nations emerging in those old, old consensual cultures.

Recent histories are packed by leaders who successfully committed their hero/martyr follies and by those who tried and failed in correcting them. It’s doubtful if Majority Governance and its Rule of Law, under any preferred politically correct nomenclature, can really be scaled up any further to create amity, stability, and prosperity worldwide.

Diversities-&-variations-respecting Consensual Governance, aided by non-governing global communication, appears to be a more realistic alternative for the next Christian Millennium. For this, notions of prosperity based upon excessive, inefficient and unnecessary production-&-consumption, purveying of techno-fantasies inimical to our species and gun-running must be jettisoned with extreme urgency.

‘Prosperity’ isn’t derived from a Shakespearean character and ‘Government’ doesn’t have Greek ‘helmsmanship’ roots. The Sanskrit ‘paraspar’ is approximated by ‘mutual’ while ‘Gûrû+mantra’ suggests an advisory function. For advice to catalytically function sustainably in the desired direction, carrot & stick games, latently threatening ‘messages’, and exhibitions of technological prowess are counterproductive; one needs only, say the ancients, the moral force of loving care which is transparently motivated by an equation that keeps ‘self’ at the bottom of the heap. In fact that is what ‘Sarva’ (everyone) + ‘Sva’ (self) – from which ‘Service’ is derived – means.

—This is an edited version of the document that was snail-mailed, August 30, 1997, to President Bill Clinton

Mar 1, 2006

Understanding means creating accommodative images

Extracts from Rotary Club, Sambalpûr (Main)
February 28, 2003
Guest Speaker: Vyôm Akhil, R.F.A. (1985-86, R.I.D. 3260-5260)
Topic: International Understanding

Friends, ….I have to.. (now).. with you (my thoughts on) the.. nature of Understanding…..:

Given that over a millennia-spanning period, our species has consistently demonstrated that it will unerringly choose to be silly, stupid, selfish, dangerous, vindictive, arrogant, jealous - the list is as long as you wish to stretch it - one may ask why do we need to understand anything at all? The insects and animals - not to mention all that is inanimate - do very well in the surviving-&-thriving game without, apparently, understanding a thing. In fact a saint had gone so far as to say ‘happy and content are those who are not bothered by the conditions and problems of the world’.

During a previous visit to your Club, I had spoken of the stage-related origins of the word “Understanding”. Someone had to stand under the stage and hand up the props, such as a bouquet, to a Romeo who would use it then as a love-vehicle and give it to the actress playing Juliet. The word originally meant, “to be supportive”. That is not the same as “being wise and full of insights.”

Understanding is a first but not the final step towards an accommodative, mutually beneficial sustainable co-existence. Without this goal at the end, an ocean full of understanding cannot, with any reliable degree of certainty, prevent aggression and attack, cruelty, violence, destruction and tragedy.

Resolving existing conflicts is laudable and that is what negotiators skilled in the use of facts and their effective communication try to do. But this heroic act is akin to performing a life-saving surgery on an old and malignant tumor that has brought the body to the verge of death. To this extent conflict-resolution is the next thankless step in the vocabulary of crisis management. Frequently, the high-pressured process of resolving conflicts, reasonable dialogue has to be set aside because there are deadlines to meet and innocent lives might be lost. Often negotiators have to go into what I call the deal-making mode.

Friends, it is obvious that understanding is multidimensional. From an individual wrestling with the essential nature of Being and Becoming, to a group that may be as small as a nuclear, or, even a single-parent family of two, or a tribe, a community, a village, a region, a nation, all the way up to the global level of international understanding, there are events and on-going processes that first need an understanding and then a comfortable accommodation. Beyond the international, we need understandings and accommodation with nature and our physical space - with those creatures, whether plant, insect or animal. And this needs to occur both at the local as well as global level. But as we explore outwards from this planet, there are understandings that challenge our notions of time and space, of the meaning of life and intelligence. Called by the National Geographic Society in 1976 to look at the future, the late R. Buckminster Fuller observed that after having traveled 39 times around the world and actually feeling it to be a tiny planet of a tiny star, he was convinced no one out there in the Universe was dying to know who would be the next president of the United States.

We can also appreciate the fact that partial understandings in one domain affect the processes in the other. That, at every level, there has to be a good fit to build upon. In some respects the nature of understanding is like those in fractals. For instance, there is the oft-quoted Sanskrit aphorism, “Yathä-piñdé tathä-brahmäñdé”. One can looslely translate this to say, ‘as the point, so the Universe.’

Today, understanding is when you say, “I see!” or “I got it!” or even more colloquially “Bingo!” or, Jackpot!” Clearly, this is more than being supportive. It means to be able to figure out something, to know its nuts and bolts, its P’s and Q’s. …Therefore, we revert to the intent of the original Sanskrit word, “Antarsthäna”. For what is really occurring when you understand something today is a mental process.

But how does the human - perhaps all mammalian - mind process information, most of which comes to it through the sense of sound? Even the horizon, be it noted, is limited to line of sight vision. It is for this reason that our sound-sensory apparatus switches on during gestation, long before we are born to this earth. One can say that our ears have a head start!1

What exactly happens when we receive sounds from the outside? Brain scans now confirm that our visual cortex is stimulated and our minds use the sound to create an internal image of the event.

It is this image that predominates the one we receive from our eyes. We even say of a prejudiced person as one, whose vision is colored, thereby implying that the internal image he has, overpowers the evidence of his own physical eyes.

At this point, to limit my exposition, I shall revert to Sanskrit words, “Chitta” or the active part of the mind, “Chétanä” or the state of consciousness, and “Chitra” or an image, usually internally formed in the active part of our mind; for the one visible on the retina Sanskrit has the “Drishya”.

I have a confirmation of sorts. Don’t people who understand something say, “I see” without really meaning that they are sighted and not blind?

I am, therefore, suggesting to you something that may not have been submitted to anyone anywhere:

Understanding means creating accommodative images.

I use the word “accommodative” with reason. Quarrels occur when our images are not in agreement. We have the famous and well-known story of the six blind men who were using their sense of touch to figure out what an elephant was. And each had an image that did not agree with those of the others.

Friends, I now have to use two phrases to explain my next point. We have this ‘Image-based understanding” and we, the educated and the influenced, find we also try, unsuccessfully, to often substitute it with what I would call ‘A word-based understanding’.

Here, when I say ‘word-based’, I mean those words that do not create an image for one reason or another, like the abuse, or overuse of available of visual technologies. Most words - especially long speeches are so boring, listeners fall asleep. …..

Opposed to a word-based understanding, I bring an example of an image-based understanding in the shape of a small visual - a chart - that I like to call “Humankind’s Price of Fear and what can be done if we reduced it just by 25%….” (this is posted elsewhere on this site).

Jan 24, 2006

Avadhänam: question, retention, answers

Wikipedia says it well:
Avadhanam is a literary feat popular from the very ancient days in Sanskrit, Telugu, Kannada etc. It requires immense memory power and tests a person's capability of performing multiple tasks simultaneously.
‘Avadhänam is an experiment as old as the language itself… In olden days an avadhäni was supposed to be proficient in eight languages and was expected to compose poems in all eight languages as answers to questions…. The feat was used to test the scholarship of the performer in traditional knowledge. Initially, it started with testing one’s proficiency in pada, krama, Gana and Jata of Védädhyayana but later spread to literature and poetry….

“The pruchchaka asks a complex question in the form of four words. The avadhäni has to keep in mind all the questions in the order they are posed and give the answer in the same order, filling the blanks in verse form. The meter is also mentioned.

“Performing avadhänam is no ordinary feat. The complicated system of attentive listening to the question, retention, weaving answers to it in a manner satisfying to the scholars and reciting the answer in the order it is supposed to be, is like Yôga. ‘Dhyäna, Dhäranä and Samädhi’ are the three characteristics which are present in avadhänam.

With time, avadhänam has become more complex. Social problems are being reflected in the questions nowadays. Kashmir issue to Naxalites to budget to Cinema songs -everything is a subject matter nowadays. For example, one might say “idly, vadä, sämbar and pûri”, and ask the avadhäni to describe Pärvati Parinayam. This happened once.

A renowned scholar like Pandit Dr. Shankar Dayäl Sharmä sometime ago asked Näagaphani Sharmä to describe Lord Shiva in Sanskrit using for words chapäti, parotä, sämbhar and kûrmä. The avadhäni rendered a shlôka in Sanskrit an it was this:
Yashchapati jagatsarvam, monuku pa parvotati, samba rudra tamasvita, vayukurma namasvatam. (The one who is ruling the creation, the one who is all compassionate, the one who is goddess Amba, to such a one I bow down a hundred times - This is not a good translation by the writer at all!)

Sri Cheruku Satyanäräyana Sästry, known to trouble avadhänis with his ticklish posers, had this four-word input :Roop Terä Mastänä pyär Merä Divänä that had to be used for describing Lord Räama.The answer: Neelabhra roopate Räama, Samastänäm Shubhankara,
Tattadhä pyärame Räme, Nädivandana Vardhana.

Such should be the clarity of thought and mastery over language.

Additional note:
In Telugu, avadhänam was prevalent even during Adikavi Nannayya period. His colleague Narayana Bhattu who first earned the title ashtadashävadhäni